Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Top Guidelines Of copy of case law judgments in 2013
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
14. In the light of the position explained over, it can be concluded that a civil servant includes a fundamental right to get promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but could not be viewed as for no fault of his very own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the size of service or inside the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 269 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
4. Record shows that the petitioner continues to be booked in as much as 8 criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Even though the petitioner has obtained bail in Those people cases, it does, prima facie, establish that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents to the Supreme Court on the United States is available about the court’s website.
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID required) to criminal case information in participating Circuit Courts with the purpose of confirming of the individual’s date of birth.
Reasonable grounds can be found about the record to attach the petitioner with the commission of your alleged offence. Though punishment of the alleged offence does not tumble in the prohibitory clause of Section 497, Cr.P.C. however uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General apprises that another case of similar nature arising out of FIR No. 1250/2024 dated ten.05.2024 registered under Section 489-File, PPC at Police Station Haji Pura, District Sialkot is in the credit in the petitioner as accused, therefore, case of the petitioner falls from the exception where bail cannot be granted even in the cases not falling within the ambit of prohibition contained in Section 497, Cr.P.C. In this regard, steerage is sought from the case of “Muhammad Imran versus The State and others” (PLD 2021 Supreme Court 903); relevant portion with the same is hereby reproduced:
The reason for this difference is that these civil law jurisdictions adhere to a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision as well as statutes.[four]
In almost any society, the enforcement of regulation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. One of the most serious crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to ensure justice prevails.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, including eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic click here analysis, confirming the copyright nature of the seized currency.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which could cause reduced charges or acquittal.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling to the same kind of case.
However, it’s essential to note that the application of the death penalty is subject matter to several legal safeguards and owing process to guarantee fair trials.
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to ascertain a commission of internationally known and recognized experts to review and rule on potential grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power lines.